About Us Members Only Legislative & Political News Member Benefits Safety & Training IMI Canada IPF IMI
search
 
620 F Street NW
Washington, DC 20004
202.783.3788
 
About Us Members Only Legislative & Political News Member Benefits Safety & Training
About Us
Canada IPF IMI IHF Become a Member
Issue: JUNE - JULY 2002
Index

Archives

News In Brief

›  Women in the Trowel Trades

›  AAC Conference Draws Industry Crowd at New Illinois District Council 1 Training Center

›  American Architectural Review Series Showcases BAC

Good Reasons to Vote in 2002

Tools for Election 2002

BAC Ties Help Battle Against Cancer

 

 

Good Reasons to Vote in 2002

Protecting Social Security, enhancing Medicare, and maintaining Davis-Bacon and state prevailing wage laws are just three of the many reasons to vote on November 5th. With both houses of Congress, 36 governorships, and several anti-worker, pro-business ballot initiatives at stake, organized labor is gearing up for a series of tough political battles this election season.

Gambling With Social Security

Corporate scandals and plunging stock market values haven’t stopped President Bush’s plan to privatize Social Security. The Bush-appointed Social Security commission outlined several ways to privatize Social Security in its recent report, each of which would result in drastic cuts in traditional Social Security benefits (retirement income, disability and death benefits), and require a portion of workers’ Social Security payroll taxes to be shifted to unsecured private accounts. According to an analysis of the commission’s recommendations by the Century Foundation — Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, under these schemes “more than $1 trillion over the next 10 years and almost $3 trillion over the next 20 years” would be shifted from Social Security to these private accounts.

For workers in physically demanding jobs, such as those performed by BAC members, the changes proposed by the President’s commission would be even worse. The proposal uses “a back-door method to raise the retirement age before workers can collect full benefits,” according to the Institute for America’s Future.

Administration’s Prescription Plan Benefits Drug Companies — Not Seniors

Double-digit increases in the cost of prescription drugs have hurt all of us, but for many of the 40 million people over age 65 covered by Medicare it’s a life or death issue. An analysis of the Bush administration’s proposal conducted by the Congressional Research Service shows the “Republican bill’s benefits are about 40 percent less than benefits in legislation proposed by Democrats.” Under the Bush proposal senior citizens would have to pay higher premiums and out-of-pocket expenses, and use HMO-type plans to obtain prescription drug coverage.

In contrast, House and Senate Democratic proposals call for Medicare to “cover a large portion of beneficiaries’ prescription costs, set a cap on out-of-pocket expenses and carry a $25-a-month premium.”

BAC is working to defeat the Republican backed bill Medicare Prescription Drug Act of 2002 (H.R. 4954) in the House, and supports the McCain-Schumer The Greater Access to Pharmaceuticals Act (S. 812) in the Senate.

Davis-Bacon Under Attack

Davis-Bacon and state prevailing wage laws (sometimes called “little Davis-Bacon” laws), require contractors to pay their employees the prevailing — or most common — wage in a given market on state and federally funded construction projects. These laws ensure that workers are paid a fair wage, and discourage contractors from bringing low-wage workers into a community and undercutting the local workforce and the community’s economic base.

Congress is now considering the Water Investment Act of 2002 (S. 1961) and the Water Quality Financing Act of 2002 (H.R. 3930). These bills would provide states with $35 billion in federal funds to build water infrastructure for required clean water projects.

The bills are in jeopardy, however, because House Majority Leader Dick Armey has announced that he will not allow H.R. 3930 to come to the floor because it includes Davis-Bacon wage provisions. A win by Armey and other opponents of Davis-Bacon on this bill would create a bigger threat to Davis-Bacon and state prevailing wage laws on new school construction funding proposals, and undercut wages being paid on school construction projects. You can act now by calling your representative toll-free at 1-877-611-0063 and urging them to support Davis-Bacon provisions in S. 1961 and H.R. 3930, and all federally financed infrastructure programs.

Get Registered and Vote in November

Remember, labor’s turnout at the polls on Election Day is the most effective tool we have to get elected officials to take notice, listen, and respond to our needs on these and other important issues.respond to our needs on these and other important issues.