Think the Corporate Scandals Haven’t Affected
You? Think Again!
Corporate Wrongdoing Hurts Working Families and Retirees
Reports of huge financial losses
and incomprehensible levels of corporate and personal greed
at companies including Enron, Tyco, Adelphia, and WorldCom,
coupled with questionable financial maneuvers by President
Bush while a director of Harken Energy Corp. and by Vice
President Cheney when he was CEO of Halliburton, are having
a chilling effect on the country.
“These scandals and the Bush Administration’s
delayed and often watered-down response are undermining
consumer confidence, jeopardizing the economic recovery and
destroying millions of workers’ retirement security,” says
President John J. Flynn. The numbers are staggering. According
to a report by Fortune Magazine (September 2, 2002), top
executives at “America’s Losingest Companies” made
roughly $66 billion by selling their stockholdings before
their company’s stock value plummeted and the holdings
of unsuspecting investors were virtually wiped out.
In a recent address to the Senate,
Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) indicated that the still-unfolding
scandals of corporate mismanagement and fraud would have
a severe impact on hard-working American families. Already,
shareholders, including pension funds through their investments
in individual stocks, mutual funds, the S&P 500 index,
and other funds, have lost billions of dollars due to the
sharp drop in the stock market’s
value. Since stock prices peaked a couple of years
ago, the value of publicly traded stock has fallen by roughly
$7 trillion (The Washington Post, July 23, 2002), and well
over a trillion dollars has literally evaporated from workers’ retirement
and savings funds. According to a USA Today/CNN/Gallup
Poll, “nearly
half of those saving for retirement, 46 percent, say
they will have to postpone retiring because of the shrinking
stock market.”
Individuals covered by traditional
defined benefit plans, such as the International Pension
Fund, which guarantees a certain level of income for
life in retirement, are in much better shape than those workers
whose primary source of retirement income is a 401(k)
(defined contribution plan). This is because 401(k)s increase
or decrease depending on the investment mix. Although traditional
pension plans are not immune to the overall drop in stock
values, participants have far greater protections. “But
even traditional plans face challenges when the stock market
takes the kind of hit it has in the last year or so,” says
Flynn. In the short-term, traditional plans will have to
be more conservative about plan improvements in order to
ensure that plans remain properly funded. The International
Pension Fund’s
value has held up well during this period, according
to the funds Executive Director David Stupar. “We’re
pleased to report that when Enron went down, IPF didn’t
hold one share of its stock.”
Plummeting stock market values have also
had an impact on the on-going Social Security debate. Although
many former supporters of privatization are changing their
tune, the Administration is still pushing to privatize
the Social Security System. That’s the bad
news. The good news is more Americans are beginning
to understand the downside of a privatized Social
Security System — a
system where an individual’s
contributions are invested in a private account.
In a Wall Street Journal/NBC poll conducted in July,
55 percent of Americans say they oppose partial privatization
of Social Security. And a recent report by the non-partisan
Center for Economic and Policy Research found “that
if the President’s
Commission plan which invested 2 percent of Social
Security payroll taxes in the stock market was enacted
in 1998, workers would have lost $31 billion in the
stock market just through June of this year.”
While
many of the Republican candidates up for election
this November have become silent on this issue, efforts
are still underway “behind the scenes” to
privatize the Social Security System.
A loss of retirement savings
isn’t the only hit
felt by working families as a result of corporate scandals.
Household net worth is at its lowest level in years,
personal debt is up, banks have tightened lending standards
making it harder for businesses to get loans, and state
and local revenues are down.
The result — capital
for new building projects is harder to come by, with
funds for private and public construction projects
tightening up, and unemployment is rising. The unemployment
rate rose to 5.9 percent in July from 4.6 percent
just one year earlier. The construction industry is
feeling the effects. The unemployment rate in the construction
industry rose from 7.1 percent in July 2001 to 10.3
percent in July 2002 — the
highest level in more than five years.
In an effort to restore
confidence in the scandal-tainted corporate world, U.S.
lawmakers reached agreement on July 24, 2002, on the toughest
new restrictions on accounting practices since the Great
Depression. Much of the Senate bill, introduced by Senator
Paul Sarbanes (D-MD) was preserved. The new legislation
will create an independent oversight board of auditors,
ultimately overseen by the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Companies will no longer be permitted
to hire the same accounting firm for auditing and
for many consulting services. Corporations will be
required to establish independent auditing committees,
and violators of new and existing corporate laws
will face tougher fines and jail sentences.
|