Some Wins, Some Losses for Workers
Voters turned out in November to redraw the battle lines
of a Congress sharply divided, to elect 36 governors, reshape
state legislatures, and settle hundreds of local and state
ballot questions. Republican candidates, aided by President
Bush, campaigned heavily on homeland security issues, and
voters — still anxious in the wake of September 11th — responded
favorably. Modest but strategic gains in the Congressional
races increased the Republicans’ hold in the House
by eight seats, and helped them win control of the Senate.
 |
| The support of working
families clinched election-day victories for Governor-elect
Jennifer Granholm in Michigan and Governor-elect Brad
Henry in Oklahoma. |
Despite Congressional losses, gubernatorial contests were
less disappointing for working families in a number of
states, including California, where Governor Gray Davis
won his second
term in office after a hard-fought, nationally-scrutinized
battle. Labor-endorsed candidates also picked up important
governorships in Michigan, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma,
and Tennessee. Labor activists will also be keeping a watchful
eye on statehouses where Right-to-Work legislation has
the greatest potential for gaining momentum, such as
Arizona,
Colorado, Iowa, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Wisconsin.
Although this was labor’s
strongest push ever to mobilize union members in an effort
to replace anti-union public officials,
because of problems with exit polling and the Voter Service
Network, labor leaders may never be able to assess the overall
voting strength of union members in this election.
Turnout
percentages aside, veteran pollsters Stan Greenberg and
Robert Borosage reported to AFL-CIO affiliates that based
on several joint post-election surveys conducted by the
Campaign
for America’s Future and the Democracy Corps, “the
same voters who put Republicans in control of both houses
of Congress also support a broad reform agenda,” including
expanded health care coverage, an economic stimulus package
that cancels the tax cut for the top one percent income
bracket, and investments in school construction.” This
disconnect between who they voted for, and the economic
reforms they want, highlights the failure of pro-labor
candidates
to speak “collectively” about a “coherent
plan for the economy,” and contributed to the losses
in this election, according to Greenberg and Borosage.
“The challenge now,” says BAC President John
J. Flynn, “is
for our members to continue to stay informed on the issues,
to make our voices heard, to fight for the reforms that most
Americans want, and not to be snowed by smooth-talking politicians
and special interests who blur the issues.” These are
the keys to confronting the all-wealth-to-the-wealthy economics
of the current administration.
Post-Election Update
As this Journal goes to press …
- Pro-labor
Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) won a hotly
contested re-election run-off, narrowing the
Republicans’ Senate
majority, which now stands at 51 to 49.
- The Homeland Security Act
of 2002 was finally passed by the Senate.
At the direction of the White House, this first action
by the new Republican-dominated
Senate stripped federal workers employed by the new Department of Homeland
Security of their right to union representation.
|
BAC’s “Government
Relations” webpage contains
valuable tools to help members brush up on important issues
and make their views known to members of Congress. For
more information, visit www.bacweb.org and go to the “Government
Relations” section, or call the Government Relations
Department at 202-383-3116.
|